Online Academic Supervision

Helping therapists achieve their academic goals

Hello, I’m Lynda!

Academic supervision is quite different to clinical supervision, requiring a specific academic skillset that’s difficult to find in our profession.

As a qualified psychotherapist with an academic background, I help qualified and trainee counsellors/psychotherapists to achieve their academic goals.

Before becoming a psychotherapist, I was an Assistant Professor at the University of Nottingham for 14 years, where I taught and supervised degree, masters, and PhD level students. I also published my research and reviewed other researchers’ work. See some of my work here.

I combine academic supervisory skills and my experience of doing qualitative case study research, with knowledge of psychotherapy, to support you in completing assignments and dissertations, or in meeting the requirements of accreditation.

I offer different levels of support depending on your needs, this includes one-to-one meetings to discuss research, and reviews of written work with feedback provided.

If you’re interested in my service see the sample packages illustrated below. These can be tailored to meet your unique needs. Please contact me by email for more information and details of my pricing structure.

Sample support packages

  • 1. One-to-one meetings & ongoing reviews

    • Meet with you online to provide ongoing support for your work, including discussions about your plans for: topic areas, content, research approach, work already completed, or plans to complete work.

    • Highlight areas of your work that require clarity.

    • Make suggestions to enhance the readability of your work.

    • Suggest improvements to the structure of your work.

    • Highlight inconsistencies in style, tone, and use of language.

    • Check that the correct reference style has been followed.

    • Send your work back with tracked changes and my comments/suggestions.

    NB: As this is your work, I would not rewrite any of it or substantially change its content and meaning.

  • 2. Reviews of work

    • Communicate with you by email about your work.

    • Highlight areas of your work that require clarity.

    • Suggest improvements to the structure of your work.

    • Highlight inconsistencies in style, tone, and use of language.

    • Check that the correct reference style has been followed.

    • Send your work back with tracked changes and my comments/suggestions.

    NB: As this is your work, I would not rewrite any of it or substantially change its content and meaning.